Unintended Consequences

Posted on by
Retrieved: October 22, 2019, 2:19 pm

This article written by Dr. Reynold Bergen, BCRC Science Director, originally appeared in the October 2019 issue of Canadian Cattlemen magazine and is reprinted on the BCRC Blog with permission of the publisher.

I once spent a summer working for canola breeders. Some used traditional selection, while others were experimenting with transgenics. One traditionalist was known to say “sticking a new gene into a plant and expecting it to grow better is like throwing a new gear into a watch and expecting it to keep better time. It’ll probably get worse”. This article isn’t about canola or genetics, but it is about time and unintended consequences. Specifically, it’s about the timing of the breeding and calving seasons.

Canada’s cow-calf sector has moved towards fewer, larger beef cow herds. Calving later, on pasture has been a widely adopted strategy allowing producers to expand their cow herds without a proportional increase in equipment, labor, and facilities. When John Basarab led Alberta’s Cow-Calf Audits in the late 1980’s and late 90’s, breeding often started in May and calving started in late February. In contrast, 70% of the producers responding to the 2017 Western Canadian Cow-Calf Survey started breeding in June or July to calve in March or April.

Cheryl Waldner, Sarah Parker and John Campbell of the Western College of Veterinary Medicine established the Western Canadian Cow-Calf Surveillance Network (WCCCSN) under the 2013-18 Beef Science Cluster. They recently published a study that revealed potential tradeoffs between different breeding and calving seasons (Identifying performance benchmarks and determinants for reproductive performance and calf survival using a longitudinal field study of cow-calf herds in western Canada; PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219901).

What They Did: The research team worked with 105 cow-calf herds across Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Over the next four years, participating producers were surveyed about the start and end of the breeding season, pregnancy rates, and calf survival among cows and first-calf heifers. Data were analyzed based on herd size (herds with less than 300 breeding females vs. 300 or more) and when the breeding season started (April or earlier, May, June, and July/August).

What they Learned: Cow pregnancy rates were similar in small and large herds, but large herds were more likely to have more open heifers than small herds. Average cow pregnancy rates were highest (94%) when the breeding season started in May or June and lowest when the breeding season began in April or earlier (93%), or in July/August (92%). Heifer pregnancy rates were also lower when breeding began in July/August (87%) compared to earlier (92%). The top 25% of producers achieved pregnancy rates of 95% in both cows and heifers.

Average cow pregnancy rates were highest (94%) when the breeding season started in May or June and lowest when the breeding season began in April or earlier (93%), or in July/August (92%).

Calf death losses in the first 24 hours after birth were lowest (1.7%) on average among cows bred in July/August, intermediate in cows bred in May (2.1%) and June (1.9%), and highest (2.5%) in cows bred in April or earlier. Calf death loss among heifers was the same regardless when breeding started. Death loss in the first 24 hours was similar regardless of herd size, and the top 25% of producers lost fewer than 1% of calves born to cows, and 0% of heifer’s calves.

Calf death losses from 24 hours to weaning were lowest on average in calves born to cows bred in July/August (1.9%) and got progressively higher the earlier the breeding started (2.3% in June, 2.7% in May, 3.5% in April or earlier). Death loss was lowest in calves born to heifers bred in May or June (2.5% to 2.3%), higher among calves born to heifers bred in July/August (3.1%), and highest in calves from heifers bred in April or earlier (4.4%). Herd size did not affect calf death loss among cows but was higher in heifers’ calves from large herds. The top 25% of producers lost 1% of calves from cows, and 0% of heifer’s calves.

What it Means: Shifting from winter to spring calving has improved the health and survival of beef calves in Western Canada. Calving on pasture reduces disease spread, and fresh grass supports colostrum and milk production. Late spring calving avoids more snowstorms and death losses. But breeding cows in late summer (for late spring calving) may reduce pregnancy rates because pasture conditions and nutritional value are starting to decline. Rebreeding success is much higher when cows are on a ‘rising plane of nutrition’, i.e. as pasture conditions improve in late spring and early summer. In late summer, forage fiber content generally starts to increase, digestibility decreases, and protein levels drop. It will be even more challenging to rebreed heifers raising their first calf at this time, since they’re still growing themselves and have higher nutritional requirements than mature cows.

A simple delay in the breeding season may require other management practices to change in order to avoid unintended drops in reproductive performance. Careful and well-planned rotational grazing management that keeps forage vegetative (instead of mature and heading out) can help ensure cows are on a rising plane of nutrition into later breeding seasons. Supplementation may be needed on pasture, particularly in drought years. Addressing these challenges will require veterinarians, reproductive specialists, animal nutritionists, forage breeders, grazing experts and economists to work together to understand and best manage the whole system.

The Beef Research Cluster is funded by the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada with additional contributions from provincial beef industry groups and governments to advance research and technology transfer supporting the Canadian beef industry’s vision to be recognized as a preferred supplier of healthy, high quality beef, cattle and genetics.

Click here to subscribe to the BCRC Blog and receive email notifications when new content is posted.

The sharing or reprinting of BCRC Blog articles is typically welcome and encouraged, however this article requires permission of the original publisher.

We welcome your questions, comments and suggestions. Contact us directly or generate public discussion by posting your thoughts below.

One thought on “Unintended Consequences

  1. Actually, there are many examples of unintended consequences in the management of beef cow/calf operations across the country … and most of these arise from focussing on a few production elements and not giving thought to the repercussions in the rest of the cow herd’s performance indicators, other enterprise considerations, and, most importantly, the implications on short and long term business profitability.

    For example, many years ago, increasing the weaning weight of calves was a focal point. Producers used genetics and operations management to do just that … and we observed considerable success in increasing wean weights. Unfortunately, we inadvertently selected for much larger, less economical cows. The net result, in many instances, not only did the long term profitability of ranches diminish, but they forced other resource use on farm and were left with the costliness and inflexibility of reversing the “error”.

    To be fair, this kind of assessment must be taken on a business by business basis … general tendencies and averages may give us food for thought, but it boils down to doing a specific on-farm assessment, starting with the herd change, branching out to systems changes and at each step of the way asking the question, “will this make me more profitable … using my own farm’s costing”.

    So, the unintended consequences have multiple facets … good things MAY happen in your immediate area of intention … but before you launch, you need to evaluate that might happen to other herd performance measures, in other related enterprises, and, most importantly, if these changes will improve your long term profitability.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *