Print Version:

These Little Piggies Ate a Quarter Pounder a Day

Retrieved: December 11, 2018, 5:40 am

This article written by Dr. Reynold Bergen, BCRC Science Director, originally appeared in the November 2015 issue of Canadian Cattlemen magazine and is reprinted on the BCRC Blog with permission of the publisher.

Does eating beef from implanted cattle cause young girls to reach puberty sooner?


CattlemensNOV2015
Hormonal growth promotants have been used in beef cattle for a long time. The newest one (trenbolone acetate) has been around for nearly 35 years, while implants containing estradiol have been around for 60 years. Growth promotants improve growth rates and feed efficiency, but also reduce environmental impacts. A 2012 paper by Capper and Hayes (J. Anim. Sci. 90:3527-3537) estimated that producing the same amount of beef without growth promotants would require 12% more cattle, 11% more feed, 10% more land, 7% more fertilizer, 8% more fuel, produce 10% more manure and greenhouse gas, and increase retail prices by 8%.

Consumer concerns around the safety of the beef from implanted cattle are more recent. Plants also contain estrogen-like hormones (phytoestrogens), so a counter-argument is that ‘there are more hormones in the bun than in the burger’. A 2014 paper by James Magolski and co-workers at North Dakota State University reported on a study that used pigs to gain insight into whether growth implants used in beef production may cause young girls to hit puberty sooner (The Journal of Nutrition 114:1718-1724).

What They Did: This research team fed four different diets to 24 closely-related, two-month-old female pigs that had not reached puberty yet. Pigs are a well-accepted model animal for human nutrition studies because humans and pigs have very similar anatomy and physiology. The Control group was fed a diet containing corn and a protein supplement based on canola meal. Canola contains relatively low levels of phytoestrogens. The Tofu group was fed the control diet, plus a tofu burger. Tofu is made from soy, which contains much more phytoestrogen than canola meal. The Implant group was fed the control diet, plus a quarter-pound beef burger made from cattle implanted with 100 mg trenbolone acetate and 14 mg estradiol benzoate (e.g. Synovex Choice). The Natural group was fed the control diet plus a natural beef burger made from an un-implanted steer. All four diets contained the same amount of protein and energy, and all pigs were fed the same amount every day (3.8% of body weight). Pigs were weighed every two weeks, and blood samples were collected twice weekly. Estrogen activity was measured in both the diet and the blood samples. The pigs were slaughtered after they had reached puberty so that measurements could be made on the reproductive tract.

What They Learned: Estrogenic activities of the diets were the same for the Control, Implant and Natural diets, but were up to 3.5 times higher for the Tofu diet. Plant-based diets can have much higher levels of estrogen activity than beef from implanted or naturally-raised cattle.

Estrogen and progesterone levels in the blood were the same for the gilts on all four diets. How did that happen if the Tofu diet had significantly more estrogenic activity than the other three diets? This may be because dietary hormones often have very low oral bioavailability. The vast majority of hormones consumed in the diet are broken down by stomach acids or digestive enzymes; very few of them are absorbed into the bloodstream. Hormones that are injected or implanted reach the bloodstream and tissues, but hormones that are eaten rarely do. Although the Tofu pigs ate a lot of phytoestrogens, very little of it reached the bloodstream.

Effects on animal growth and reproductive characteristics were the same for all four diets. There were no differences in growth rate, feed efficiency, longissimus muscle area (pork chop), fat depth, age at puberty, uterine weight, uterine length, ovarian weight or ovarian activity among the four diets. The hormones in the beef or tofu burgers did not affect the pigs.

What it Means: Hormones in beef from implanted or unimplanted cattle had no effect on the growth or reproductive development of young female pigs. Even the tofu-containing diet had no effect on any physiological, anatomical or reproductive measurements, even though the tofu-containing diet had much higher levels of plant estrogens than the other diets.

Pigs obviously aren’t identical to humans, but they are a well-accepted biomedical model for human nutrition studies. Using pigs as a biomedical model also allowed much more detailed and post-slaughter measurements to be collected than would be possible in a human study. The close genetic relationships among the animals, and tight control over the diets, intake and environment also allowed this study to be done using a small number of pigs. This study demonstrated that young, growing gilts can eat the equivalent of a quarter-pound beef burger every day for an extended period of time with no impacts on how fast or efficiently they grow or when they reach puberty.

Click here to subscribe to the BCRC Blog and receive email notifications when new content is posted.

The sharing or reprinting of BCRC Blog articles is typically welcome and encouraged, however this article requires permission of the original publisher.

We welcome your questions, comments and suggestions. Contact us directly or generate public discussion by posting your thoughts below.

3 thoughts on “These Little Piggies Ate a Quarter Pounder a Day

  1. Interesting but personally I doubt if hormones really do anything at all for the producer. I have marketed calves for years–never used hormones–and yet my calves are consistently among the heaviest going through the sale (for their breed). These calves are raised under range conditions, the cows spending 8 months a year only on range (this is the South Okanagan in B. C.) with no supplements or protein tubs on the range. The cows are fed a hay only diet with the odd protein tub if hay is poor quality.

    I am not a health food addict but I do doubt if hormones really offer anything to ranchers other than a placebo and, at best, a crutch to cover management lapses. I recognize that probably most ranchers use hormone injections but, as I pointed out regarding weights, I do not see the actual physical benefit.

  2. Hi Ed

    Growth promotants will increase a calf’s growth potential. But the calves also need to have enough nutrition to convert that potential to increased body weight. That’s why more aggressive implants are given at the feedlot – the animals are on a higher energy, well-balanced diet – they have better fuel. But while the upside to implants may be smaller on the weaned calf side, it’s still there.

    There are a lot of reasons why your calves may be larger than your neighbors, but here are two big ones. Unless you share the same bulls, the genetics of your calves aren’t the same, even if they are the same breed. Second, you probably don’t feed them the same as your neighbor. Your ability to manage grass, grazing and winter feeding will have an enormous impact on the body condition of your cows, how quickly they rebreed, how early they calve, how old your calves are at weaning, and how well your calves grow before you wean them. So comparing your unimplanted calves to your neighbors implanted calves is a bit tricky.

    I could give you a list of research papers that say that implants work in young calves, but you could test it out yourself on your next calf crop. Here’s how you could decide whether implants are a good fit for you. It’ll take a bit of work. When you calve next spring, use yellow ear tags on all the bull calves born the first day, and use green tags for the bulls born the second day. Switch back to yellow for day three, back to green for day four, and so on until you’re done calving. When you round them up to castrate, brand and vaccinate, implant the steers with green tags but not the ones with yellow tags. Weigh them (either individually or as separate tag color groups) at weaning, at the auction mart, or at the feedlot (if you custom feed or sell direct). Compare the weights, and let us know if the two groups weighed the same. That’s a pretty quick and dirty test, but it should help you decide whether it’s worth buying implants again next year.

    If using two different colors of tags is nuisance you could switch between tags in the left vs. right ears, or odd and even tag numbers if you put them in consecutively. But don’t implant the white calves but not the black calves…. then you’d never know if the difference was because of breed or implants, which is called “confounding”.

    Reynold

  3. Pingback: Top 10 BCRC blog posts of 2015 | Rural Roots Canada

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*